Trending in Telehealth: January 2026

By and on February 6, 2026
Posted In Telehealth

Trending in Telehealth highlights monthly state legislative and regulatory developments that impact healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in January:

  • Expanded use of telehealth across specific care settings, including reproductive health, maternity support services, controlled substance prescribing, and crisis care
  • Telehealth compliance and disciplinary standards
  • Broader use of out-of-state registration pathways and licensure compacts to support interstate practice

A CLOSER LOOK

Proposed legislation & rulemaking:

  • In New York, S 1438 passed the first chamber. The bill would establish a program within the New York State Department of Health to train healthcare practitioners in abortion and related reproductive care services, including telehealth delivery of such services.
  • In Vermont, HB 84 passed the first chamber. It would amend the state’s telehealth law, which currently prohibits a healthcare provider or patient from recording a telemedicine consultation, to allow telehealth appointments to be recorded with both patient and provider consent.
  • In Wisconsin, SB 214 passed both chambers. If signed by the governor, the bill would allow out-of-state healthcare providers to register with the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) to provide telehealth services to patients in Wisconsin in lieu of requiring licensure or other registration in the state. Registered providers could provide services within the scope of practice established under Wisconsin law and would be subject to disciplinary action in Wisconsin. Registration requirements would include holding an active, unencumbered out-of-state credential that authorizes similar services in the provider’s home state; having no recent disciplinary history; designating an in-state registered agent; and maintaining malpractice coverage for services provided to Wisconsin patients. The law would prohibit registered telehealth providers from opening an in-state physical practice without obtaining a Wisconsin credential and would require DSPS to publish a list of registered telehealth providers.
  • In New Mexico, HB 13 and HB 11 each passed the first chamber. They would adopt the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact and the Audiology and Speech Language Pathology Compact, respectively.
  • A Washington proposed rule would permit state Medicaid reimbursement for certain maternity support services delivered through telemedicine, including an initial screening, replacing requirements that such services be provided in person.
  • In New Hampshire, a proposed rule would introduce an option for participants in the Choices for Independence program to elect to receive services via telehealth subject to certain requirements, including that the provider assess the appropriateness of telehealth delivery for the participant and ensure that the participant has adequate access to any necessary technology before services are provided.
  • In Wisconsin, a proposed rule would impose additional requirements on crisis care facilities. The rule would mandate the adoption of policies addressing telehealth, artificial intelligence, and consultation via electronic communication and would require facilities to maintain adequate 24/7 staffing, including through the use of telehealth.

Finalized legislation & rulemaking activity:

  • New Jersey passed, and the governor signed, SB 2283, which establishes a pilot program to support research into the therapeutic use of psilocybin for behavioral health conditions and to assess the feasibility of a regulated statewide delivery system. The law authorizes selected hospitals to administer psilocybin therapeutically, including via telehealth when consistent with the applicable standard of care, and to collect clinical outcome data to evaluate safety and efficacy.
  • North Dakota enacted HB 1622, joining the Physician Assistant Licensure Compact and establishing the framework for the state’s participation, administration, and enforcement of the compact.
  • The Washington State Board of Nursing adopted a rule requiring nurses who provide clinical services via telemedicine to complete specified state-mandated telemedicine training for healthcare professionals, consistent with a statutory requirement effective January 1, 2021.
  • Maryland adopted a rule that expands the conditions under which a telehealth practitioner may prescribe certain controlled substances. Under the rule, a telehealth practitioner may prescribe certain Schedule II opiates for the treatment of pain when a bona fide practitioner-patient relationship has been established, provided the practitioner maintains ongoing responsibility for the patient’s assessment, care, and treatment and an in-person assessment has previously been conducted by the practitioner or another provider within the same group practice.
  • Florida adopted rules updating the disciplinary guidelines of the Board of Physical Therapy Practice and the Board of Hearing Aid Specialists to apply rules regarding patient overpayments and refunds to telehealth registrants.

Why it matters:

  • States are expanding telehealth access while tightening guardrails. Developments reflect ongoing efforts by states to expand telehealth access through licensure compacts, out-of-state registration pathways, Medicaid coverage, and service flexibility while simultaneously imposing clearer requirements around training, staffing, and professional accountability.
  • States are leveraging telehealth to address policy priorities. Legislatures and regulators are using telehealth to support access to reproductive health services, maternity support, crisis care, and services for specialized populations, signaling telehealth’s continued integration into mainstream healthcare delivery.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott Will & Schulte digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors, and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break down barriers to delivering accessible care, and mitigate enforcement risk through proactive compliance.

Amanda Enyeart
  Amanda Enyeart maintains a general health industry and regulatory practice, focusing on fraud and abuse, information technology and digital health matters. Amanda advises health care industry clients in all aspects of software licenses and other agreements for the acquisition electronic health record (EHR) systems and other mission critical health IT.  Amanda’s health care IT transactional experience also includes advising clients with respect to software development, maintenance, service and outsourced hosting arrangements, including cloud-computing transactions. Read Amanda Enyeart's full bio.


Allie Kelley



STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law