cross-state telehealth practice
Subscribe to cross-state telehealth practice's Posts

Trending in Telehealth: June 2026

Trending in Telehealth highlights monthly state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in June:

  • Telehealth reimbursement and payment parity
  • Licensure and cross-state practice
  • Telehealth practice-specific standards and documentation requirements
  • Expansion of telehealth across specialties and e-prescribing

A CLOSER LOOK

Proposed legislation and rulemaking:

  • Iowa’s Board of Optometry proposed rule 481-762.9. If adopted, it would establish the standard of care requirements for teleoptometry, clarify when an optometrist-patient relationship is established through telehealth, and prohibit the use of telemedicine if, consistent with the standard of care, an in-person examination would be required to produce an informed diagnosis.
  • West Virginia’s Board of Medicine proposed rule 8537 seeking to establish the regulatory framework for the licensure and regulation of genetic counselors in West Virginia, including telehealth practice standards. The rule would define the telemedicine modalities that a genetic counselor may use to establish a patient relationship and would establish the same standard of care for telemedicine services as required for in-person services.
  • Vermont’s Office of Professional Regulation proposed rule 26P013, which would govern the licensing and registration of out-of-state healthcare professionals providing telehealth-only services to Vermont patients. Currently, healthcare providers who are not licensed in Vermont are not required to pay fees, but this rule would establish an application and renewal fee requirement in order to provide telehealth services to Vermont patients.
  • Texas’s Board of Pharmacy proposed rule 49743, which would establish documentation and record retention requirements for telehealth services provided by a pharmacist in Texas.
  • California AB 225 passed one chamber and aims to prevent billing for or collection of facility fees for preventive care telehealth services. The bill would impose notification requirements regarding facility fees and penalties for violations, and would prohibit health insurers from passing facility fees on to enrollees.

Finalized legislation and rulemaking:

  • Rhode Island enacted SB 3180, expanding veterinary telemedicine authority by allowing veterinarians in Rhode Island to establish provider-patient relationships using . Previously, telehealth was limited to animals with an existing provider-patient relationship. In-person examinations are required to renew a prescription that was previously renewed twice based only on virtual examinations. Controlled substances may not be prescribed without an in-person examination.
  • Florida final rule 52933 was published, establishing requirements for clinical social work, marriage and family therapy, and mental health counseling intern supervision, including hour thresholds, the use of in-person versus electronic methods, telehealth protocols, and the distinction between individual and group supervision. Face-to-face psychotherapy is defined to include electronic methods as long as certain requirements are met, including that the provider maintains a written telehealth protocol and safety plan.
  • Alaska’s second chamber passed HB 14, which would require a healthcare insurer to reimburse a provider for healthcare services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth on the same basis and at least at the same rate as for comparable healthcare services provided [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: April 2026

Trending in Telehealth highlights monthly state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in April:

  • Telehealth reimbursement
  • Cross-state telehealth practice and continuity of care
  • Telehealth practice standards and supervision requirements
  • Expansion of telehealth across provider types and care settings

A CLOSER LOOK

Proposed legislation and rulemaking:

  • In New York, S 354 passed one chamber and would amend the state public health law to expand reimbursement for telehealth services. The bill would require that healthcare services delivered via telehealth be reimbursed on the same basis, at the same rate, and to the same extent as equivalent services provided in person. The bill clarifies that reimbursement would not extend to facility-based costs not incurred in the delivery of telehealth services.

Finalized legislation and rulemaking:

  • Tennessee passed HB 2029, which enacts the Dietetics and Nutrition Practice Act. The legislation defines “telehealth” and authorizes licensed dietitians and nutritionists to provide medical nutrition therapy and other nutrition care services via real-time audio, video, or other media. It also permits certain out-of-state practitioners to provide telehealth services under specified conditions, including for continuity of care.
  • Oregon enacted HB 4070, which expands Medicaid telemedicine reimbursement by broadening the categories of eligible providers, including licensed and certain unlicensed providers, community mental health programs, hospitals, and federally qualified health centers.
  • Oregon enacted HB 4107, which establishes requirements for urgent care centers, including disclosure of whether telemedicine services are offered. When a provider is unavailable due to illness, emergency, or similar circumstance, an urgent care center may operate temporarily without a licensed healthcare provider onsite if a licensed provider is available via telemedicine and the patient is notified at the first point of contact that services will be delivered through telemedicine.
  • Kansas enacted HB 2761, which expressly authorizes the use of telepractice in the delivery and supervision of speech-language pathology services. The law defines “telepractice” as the use of telecommunication and internet-based technology to provide remote intervention services and permits speech-language pathology assistants to deliver teletherapy under the direction of a licensed speech-language pathologist. It also allows supervising speech-language pathologists to satisfy direct supervision requirements via real-time audiovisual technology, provided they can observe and communicate with the assistant during service delivery.
  • Kentucky enacted HB 424, which updates the regulation of social work practice and authorizes the provision of services via telehealth. It also establishes requirements for telehealth practice, including informed consent, confidentiality, accessibility, standards of care, documentation, and cross-jurisdiction practice.
  • Maryland enacted HB 1483, which repeals the state board’s authority to issue temporary telehealth licenses for clinical professional counselors and social workers, and establishes a limited telehealth exception for continuity of care. Under the exception, certain out-of-state licensed clinical professional counselors may continue providing telehealth services to existing clients for up to six months following the client’s relocation.
  • Vermont enacted H 84, which amends the state’s [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
LEgal 500 EMEA top tier firm 2021
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law