Trending in Telehealth: February 5 – 12, 2024

By and on February 15, 2024
Posted In Telehealth

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Facilitation of connectivity and data exchange
  • Professional standards


Finalized Legislation & Rulemaking

  • South Dakota enacted the Social Work Licensure Compact, becoming the second state to enact the compact. Missouri enacted the compact in July 2023. The compact will become active once enacted by seven states. According to the National Center for Interstate Compacts, 24 other states have introduced the compact.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase


  • In Idaho, HB 393 passed the first chamber. If enacted, it would enter Idaho into the Counseling Compact.
  • In Indiana, SB 132 passed the first chamber. Currently, Indiana law provides that an out-of-state provider licensed in Indiana may not provide telehealth services in Indiana until the provider and their employer/contractor have filed a certification with the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency that the provider and employer/contractor agree to be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and Indiana substantive and procedural laws. If enacted, the bill would remove the requirement to file the certification, though providers would still be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and Indiana substantive and procedural laws, and the provision of health services (rather than the filing of the certification) would constitute a voluntary waiver of other jurisdictional rights.
  • In West Virginia, HB 5310 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enact the Remote Patient Outcome Improvement Act to authorize insurers and providers to partner with internet service providers to facilitate the transmission and analysis of vital signs and medical device data.
  • In Wisconsin, the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Worker Examining Board proposed a rule that would update telehealth practice standards by defining telehealth, creating of a new subsection that establishes standards of telehealth practice, amending the definitions of “face-to-face” and “supervision” to include telehealth practice, and amending of unprofessional conduct provisions to incorporate telehealth practice.

Why it matters:

  • States continue to increase activity surrounding licensure compacts for a variety of health professionals. These state efforts ease the burdens of the licensing process and demonstrate a desire to facilitate multijurisdictional practice without giving up authority over professional licensure.
  • Measures emphasizing connectivity and infrastructure complement the increasing availability of reimbursement for remote monitoring and other virtual care modalities. States propose measures such as West Virginia’s Remote Patient Outcome Improvement Act with the expectation that they will help reduce costs of avoidable emergency room and other medical visits when paired with remote monitoring programs.
  • States continue to amend and clarify professional practice standards for telehealth. With the increase in the delivery of care through virtual modalities, professional boards are adopting standards governing telehealth practice across multiple health professions and revising existing standards to reflect current technologies and practices.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break down barriers to delivering accessible care and mitigate enforcement risk through proactive compliance. Are you working to make healthcare more accessible through telehealth? Let us help you transform telehealth.

Amanda Enyeart
  Amanda Enyeart maintains a general health industry and regulatory practice, focusing on fraud and abuse, information technology and digital health matters. Amanda advises health care industry clients in all aspects of software licenses and other agreements for the acquisition electronic health record (EHR) systems and other mission critical health IT.  Amanda’s health care IT transactional experience also includes advising clients with respect to software development, maintenance, service and outsourced hosting arrangements, including cloud-computing transactions. Read Amanda Enyeart's full bio.

Grayson Dimick
Grayson I. Dimick focuses her practice on regulatory and transactional matters affecting a wide range of clients across the health care industry. Grayson advises clients on a variety of issues, including the regulatory and compliance aspects of digital health. She also conducts due diligence on health care transactions.




2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law