The Opioid Crisis: Declaring a National Emergency and the Effect on Remote Prescribing through Telemedicine

Posted In Telehealth

On July 31, 2017, President Donald Trump’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis recommended that he declare the opioid epidemic a national emergency. In August 2017 and again on October 16, 2017, the president indicated he would declare the opioid crisis a national emergency. While it is apparent that the nation is suffering a drug overdose and opioid-specific crisis, the question remains as to what effect such a declaration would have on combatting the crisis.

The president’s powers to declare a national emergency arise from the Stafford Act, and once a national emergency is declared, it enables 1) access to US Department of Homeland Security ‒ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding, with states able to request grants for the specific purposes of treating opioid addiction; 2) the ability to re-appropriate federal agency workers, such as those employed by the agencies under the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) umbrella, to specifically research and treat opioid addiction; and 3) waiver of federal Medicaid regulations to provide additional aid to beneficiaries, ensuring sufficient health care items and services are available to meet the needs of beneficiaries. Such a declaration would undoubtedly open up both federal and state governments to formulate a comprehensive, unified strategy to combat the opioid epidemic sweeping the nation.

A declaration of national emergency could also eliminate one of the key barriers to the use of telemedicine as a tool in the fight against opioid addiction. As background, the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 (the Haight Act) requires a telemedicine provider who is prescribing a controlled substance to a patient to perform an in-person medical evaluation of the patient prior to prescribing a controlled substance, unless one of the narrow telemedicine exceptions set forth in the Haight Act applies. The declaration of the opioid crisis as a national emergency would trigger one of these telemedicine exceptions to the Haight Act, allowing providers to remotely prescribe controlled substances to patients without first conducting an in-person visit. This in turn would increase the ability of patients, particularly those in rural areas, to gain access to a treating physician for prescription of the pharmaceutical treatments used to treat opioid addiction, including buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone.  However, it should be noted that hurdles will still exist despite declaring the opioid crisis a national emergency. For example, methadone may only be dispensed by an opioid treatment program certified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.  Additionally, physicians must have a Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA) waiver in place to prescribe buprenorphine, and are limited to prescribing to no more than 200 patients under their individual DATA waiver.

Notwithstanding the potential hurdles, telemedicine is likely to play a substantial role in combatting opioid addiction and provider shortages, and it is important to remember that telemedicine’s utility in addiction treatment is not limited to prescribing controlled substances.  Telemedicine will undoubtedly serve as a tool in providing access to necessary counseling and psychiatric treatment that are foundational to the treatment of opioid addiction and the prevention of relapse. Increasing access to health care and pharmaceutical treatment is only the first step to addressing the opioid crisis. However, with a coordinated national strategy, intelligent funding and a long-term commitment to treating not only the effects of opioid addiction, but to its cause, the use of telemedicine will serve as an extremely potent tool in the fight against the opioid epidemic.

McDermott Will & Emery

Lisa Mazur
Lisa Mazur advises health care providers and technology companies on a variety of legal, regulatory and compliance matters with a particular focus on digital health topics, including telehealth, telemedicine, mobile health and consumer wellness. Lisa advises a variety of health care providers and technology companies involved in “digital health,” including assisting clients in developing and implementing telemedicine programs by advising on issues related to professional licensure, scope of practice, informed consent, prescribing and reimbursement. Lisa helps clients identify and understand the relevant legal issues, and develop and implement practical, forward-thinking solutions and strategies that meet the complex and still-evolving digital health regulatory landscape.  Read Lisa Mazur's full bio.

Marshall E. Jackson, Jr.
Marshall E. Jackson, Jr. focuses his practice on transactional and regulatory counseling for clients in the health care industry, as well as advises clients on the legal, regulatory and compliance aspects of digital health. Marshall provides counseling and advice to hospitals and health systems, private equity firms and their portfolio companies, post/sub-acute providers, physician practices, and other public and private health care companies in a variety of complex transactions and health regulatory compliance matters. Read Marshall Jackson's full bio.




2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law